Anthropologist Tim Ingold writes of making as ‘a practice of weaving’, and a ‘thing’, not as something complete in itself, but rather as a ‘going on’ – or better ‘a place where several goings on become entwined’(1).

As practices of weaving, such ‘things’ – intertwinings – accompany my research as ‘by-products’, offering further conversational spaces through which I mediate and process sensory, emotional, impressions and experiences that are difficult to articulate.

Reference

1    Ingold, Tim, 'The Textility of Making', Cambridge Journal of Economics, 34, 1, 2010, 91–102,